I know not all of them are like this, but a good part of the linuxera community she sure feels identified, and I am convinced that if we continue like this, we will never be able to conquer the desktop. I think we've lost track of the true meaning of what it means freedom of thought and what was the open source at first, now we have become cannibals that among ourselves we live hating ourselves and others, I hate users of Windows, I hate users of Apple, if I use Ubuntu I hate Debianites and vice versa, if I use Arch I hate Gentoo and vice versa, and worst of all, we treat potential new users as a colleague if they ask a "trivial" question for us that of course for them it is not. I am a big fan of Open Source and Linux I generally use it on a daily basis, but lately I've started to question certain things that I think we should improve as a community. I don't think that's the best example of freedom of thought and what the open source preaches and represents. I understand that this is something that had been clamoring for it to be included in gccBut since the biggest demands apparently came from large private companies, they were ignored. (Your program can have everything you want, but if users don't like it, you fail, period) Who preach freedom of thought They should just make the programs evolve based on the needs of the users, because everyone's thoughts are valid, not just the developers'.Not everything that is not strictly GPL is bad.Competition always allows evolution to benefit users.I know that this should give the most purists a headache, but we must recognize the good work of the developers of clang, and the immediate conclusion I can come to is, Of course it should be noted that magic does not only come from gedit, in fact this would not be possible without clang, using the correct APIs the other editors could also make use of code assist. If you place the pointer over the warnings it tells you the clue of what is wrong, too bad it disappears in the screenshot. In view of this I decided to test what it was about and ran (only valid for Arch and / or Manjaro) However in the end I decided to give the compiler a try for basically two reasons, I was having trouble compiling (specifically with the tag -Qunused-arguments which apparently does not exist in gcc) and second because in one of the routine updates I noticed that the Gedit He threw me a tip that to activate the "Code assistance" (code assist) needed to install clang. At first I decided to ignore the new compiler because I am one of those who thinks, why have two tools that do the same job? Gedit and Clang team up The funny thing is that the compiler is used in the course clang instead of gcc, at first this surprised me, in fact before I did not know that this compiler existed ( I later found out that there is a holy war between the two and Stallman gives him a heart attack every time clang is mentioned xD). However, I've never been a big fan of virtual machines, so reading here and there and thanks to the beautiful AUR repository I already have the basics installed. 1.1 What allowed me to discover this new functionalityĬS50 Harvard MOOC Course What allowed me to discover this new functionalityĪmong the things I do these days, there is a MOOC course taught by Harvard, CS50 through edX.org, I don't know how many of you know him but I recommend them if your desire is to learn to program ( It comes with a free certificate included, and if you don't like programming there are a lot of options to choose from), well the point is that they provide you with a virtual machine so that you can work and with all the tools included that they have already prepared for you, so you don't have to worry about anything else but learning.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |